View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
blackhawkdown Site Moderator
Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 704 Location: usa
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:39 am Post subject: ms office version differences |
|
|
can anyone tell me what the differences are between office, 2007, 2010 and the 2013 versions (other than their names)? thanks!
BHD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blknight3 Lifetime Member
Joined: 19 May 2005 Posts: 1254 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Only thing I know for relative sure is that 2010 is a lot less resource hog than 7 was. Haven't tried 13 yet. _________________ For every person with a spark of genius, there are a hundred with ignition trouble. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blackhawkdown Site Moderator
Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 704 Location: usa
|
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blknight3 wrote: | Only thing I know for relative sure is that 2010 is a lot less resource hog than 7 was. Haven't tried 13 yet. |
really? have you used '10? i use 07 extensively for work and really haven't noticed resources being used. is it that big of a difference?
BHD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blknight3 Lifetime Member
Joined: 19 May 2005 Posts: 1254 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've used 10 before. The RTM versions. Currently using 2007 as I get it free from work, and yeah on the laptops at work I tested 10 was a lot quicker. They haven't decided to upgrade yet, as they are not sure where we're going from XP, and maybe XP is the whole reason why 07 is so slow, not sure on that one.
As an example I did a test on my work laptop and my home PC, and the difference in opening just Outlook 2007 was substantial. Now I know my home PC is a lot better than work and I have an SSD, but when I say substantial I'm talking 15 seconds.
With 10 it was considerable less. Maybe 6 seconds. _________________ For every person with a spark of genius, there are a hundred with ignition trouble. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|